04.jpg
29X37-inch watercolor by Adolf Hitler's signature is
It cames from a heritage.
For 20 to 25 years
04.jpg
29X37-inch watercolor by Adolf Hitler's signature is
It cames from a heritage.
For 20 to 25 years
Below is the signature used by Hitler on one of his paintings. Also I found a picture in google of the Mein Kampf inside cover, which has the picture and signature of Adolf Hitler. There are a few differences between that and the one you posted too.
In your picture, the last letter on the first name looks more like a "y", and the third letter in the last name looks like an "s"
The signature is not Adolph Hitler.
There is no way you could get Adolf out of the first name. there is no d, o or l in it.
The last name to me is not Hitler either.
It certainly does not appear to be similar to Hitlers signature either.
He may have changed he`s signature from the early days.
But even with that in mind, i also think that is not his signature at all in the painting.
Cheers.
Nuno
Nothing like an Adolf signature unfortunately !!
The gates of hell were opened and we accepted the invitation to enter" 26/880 Lance Sgt, Edward Dyke. 26th Bn Northumberland Fusiliers , ( 3rd Tyneside Irish )
1st July 1916
Thought shall be the harder , heart the keener,
Courage the greater as our strength faileth.
Here lies our leader ,in the dust of his greatness.
Who leaves him now , be damned forever.
We who are old now shall not leave this Battle,
But lie at his feet , in the dust with our leader
House Carles at the Battle of Hastings
Nein. Not the fuhrer's scribble. The family name appears to be Histler, whilst the given name appears to be Georg J.
Regards,
Carl
Hitler's signature on these things varied wildly. Sometimes "A. Hitler", sometimes "Adolf Hitler", sometimes "A.H." and within those variants the script changed as well. However, I agree with the preceding opinions that this one does not look right.
In addition, I do not want to put myself out as an expert here, but I have collected oil paintings and watercolors for many years and I trust my gut. I just don't feel this looks like Hitler's hand. It's bad enough to be his, but that sky just looks totally wrong. The guy tended to try to have at least a little detail there. Personally, I would never put money to this thing.
you might try black lighting that thing and tell us what happens.
with any luck you might get a result that can allow you to completely rule out its authenticity. i'd remove it from the frame as well and post pics of the back of the paper and edges. but you needn't bother with any of that if it fluoresces.
Ridiculous...this piece's signature bears absolutely not the slightest resemblance to Hitler's signature-old or young...
William
"Much that once was, is lost. For none now live who remember it."
well, i agree with you Wagriff. i just like to put everything delicately.
Similar Threads
Bookmarks