Assistance with Id'ing Fake Photographs

[Gwar]

Thanks guys ! The photo was altered in the sellers original post on Ebay... The seller is gone for now...

[Witt]

Here is a pair of photos I just came across on fleabay that belong in the trash. It is funny because I immediately recognized them as fakes of the same images were discussed in this thread starting at post #16. That was 11 years ago but these do not look any better than those that were being peddled. These come from a seller on the ‘blacklist’ that I doubt has any original photographs on the block although they are “originals”. Continue to be wary of photographs that are being offered. There is a plethora of case studies right here.

[Ryan heath]

[spring]

a first you could do it. The texture of the paper seems to correspond to the marking. The best would be to test the paper on receipt.

[oliverzx6]

Hello,
please your opinion.
thanks
greetings
Oliver

[oliverzx6]

No idea ?

[BlackCat1982]

No idea ?

They both look fine to me, there isn't anything especially rare to warrant these being faked.

[spring]

In my memory, the Etche Photographie photos have a much smaller circle, or at least a smaller diameter than the one you have.
but you'll have to dig a little deeper

[oliverzx6]

Hello.

pleas your opinion.
surface of the front (picture) is shiny, like photos of the 60`s.

thanks

greetings
oliver

[spring]

You mean that the paper takes on an electric blue colour if I understand correctly. The effect is a little dull, but this is due to the incorrect use of products that should stop the effect of UV. I also don't like the quality of the image.
If it's UV positive then the agfa brovira markings are just wrong. Because agfa-brovira papers have never been treated with optical brighteners.