Havelock. Original?
Article about: Hey everyone, I'm looking for opinions on this havelock. I read Nick Komiyas write up on these, and based on his research, I believe this one to be legitimate. However, there has been some s
-
-
I haven't read Nicks information yet but I like steel fingers of this construction and shape, sewn this way and blued. I like the the material texture, weight and color. I like the overall sewing and the reinforcements where they should be. I can't translate the markings.
The condition is probably what throws most people because it would have to be a warehouse/depot find or a postwar cache (ie Warren Sessler era) or.... a total modern repro. If i were playing the big Game in poker I'd push all my chips forward, say "call" and be all in.
So Nick - what ya think about this one?
-
I believe this did come from Warren Sessler.
-
1 and 3 are fake. Can't see the hardware on 2 clearly, so undecided for that one.
-
I'm not exactly sure what you mean...All the pictures are of one havelock. This one seems to look identical to the one in your brothers collection that you used in your write up. Could the hardware be fake?
-
If it's the same havelock, it has a mixed bag of unmatched hardware. None of the hardware is as per army specs, sorry.
-
Maybe it's the photos. They all seem to be the same when I'm looking at them. I'll get some better photos tomorrow.
-
"This one seems to look identical to the one in your brothers collection that you used in your write up. " (post #28)
I agree it sure looks like the spitting image in the hardware where the corner ink marking is.
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks