-
-
01-17-2015 10:09 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
I have moved your thread to the correct Luftwaffe daggers sub forum.
Looks fine to me.
Cheers, Ade.
Had good advice? Saved money? Why not become a Gold Club Member, just hit the green "Join WRF Club" tab at the top of the page and help support the forum!
-
Hi Scott... I would like some sharper eyes to take alook at the crossguard eagle as maybe the lighting..is giving a false few of the patina. This shiney what appears to be black patina.is commonly seen on repros. I am not 100% sure of this..but it may be the lighting. I am away at the moment and would like to hear other opinions. Regards Larry
It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!!
- Larry C
One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C
“The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” - Winston Churchill
-
When I look at the pictures I would say that flash was used and that's never a good way to show good detail and patina. It is very important that you take your pictures without flash and using daylight. Having said that, I think your dagger is original. The crossguard and pommel are typical WKC products. The scabbard is a Pack type. Easy to recognise by the big leaves on the scabbard bands. Since your dagger is unmarked, it cannot be confirmed who the maker of this dagger was. It is known that many small makers used WKC and Pack parts to assemble their daggers.
Danny
-
-
-
Great 2nd set of photos Scott ..thankyou Regards Larry
It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!!
- Larry C
One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C
“The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” - Winston Churchill
-
It seems to me that there is nothing wrong....good appearance and good patina. For me is ok.
-
Bookmarks