-
-
09-08-2022 02:50 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
-
-
Don't do it. You will turn a collectible original helmet into a "messed with" oddment!
Regards
Mark
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares more about than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature with no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-
Thanks for your reply
you are definitely correct, it is not a good idea sometimes to change an original piece and I respect it as well as you believe. Perhaps I need to make it clear first. As I suggested, I was trying to get accurate information about the helmet with the national emblem from the early NVA maneuver in 1961, this is because we are preparing them as temporary stage property, and I just want to make sure all we have is accurate, so we will not make mistakes such as the having a different helmet from the wrong year of production. These stickers could be removable, so it doesn't mean permanent damage to the helmet.
In my perspective, different people have different views about their collections. It's similar to the debate that how to preserve your collection. Some people prefer to maintain them as the stage when they were found, while others want them to look brand new. I have seen a collector reclean a helmet and repaint it. The helmet now looks shiny... Behavior that is not encouraged, but you couldn't stop it.
I think it is important to get the right information, which is helpful for your identification and preservation. Having the right knowledge can prevent silly mistakes, such as using a WWII-style German tricolor emblem on an M56. I have read so many posts related to M56, and many of them were written by Mr. Mark. These posts are very instructive. I'm appreciated your reply and hoping not to dismay you
-
by
Gefilde
Thanks for your reply
you are definitely correct, it is not a good idea sometimes to change an original piece and I respect it as well as you believe. Perhaps I need to make it clear first. As I suggested, I was trying to get accurate information about the helmet with the national emblem from the early NVA maneuver in 1961, this is because we are preparing them as temporary stage property, and I just want to make sure all we have is accurate, so we will not make mistakes such as the having a different helmet from the wrong year of production. These stickers could be removable, so it doesn't mean permanent damage to the helmet.
In my perspective, different people have different views about their collections. It's similar to the debate that how to preserve your collection. Some people prefer to maintain them as the stage when they were found, while others want them to look brand new. I have seen a collector reclean a helmet and repaint it. The helmet now looks shiny... Behavior that is not encouraged, but you couldn't stop it.
I think it is important to get the right information, which is helpful for your identification and preservation. Having the right knowledge can prevent silly mistakes, such as using a WWII-style German tricolor emblem on an M56. I have read so many posts related to M56, and many of them were written by Mr. Mark. These posts are very instructive. I'm appreciated your reply and hoping not to dismay you
Understood!
I was just worried that you were about to commit sacrilege I'm glad that is not the case
Good luck with your production and it would be great to see pictures if possible?
Regards
Mark
PS As to your question;
The description on the diagram states that; The emblem is a representation of the national colours black, red and gold which is applied to the finished, painted helmet.
Kinnriemenbefestigung = Chinstrap fastening/attachment point.
Unterer Rand des Stahlhelmkorpes = Lower rim/edge of the steel helmet body.
The vertical line indicates the centre line of the helmet (not the decal) and the measurements are in millimetres.
I hope this helps.
Last edited by Watchdog; 09-09-2022 at 01:23 PM.
Reason: addition
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares more about than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature with no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-
-
Bookmarks