Espenlaub Militaria - Top
Display your banner here
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

Article about: Hello ladies and gents, A good friend who likes to visit swap meets and antique auctions just picked this dagger up locally. Third Reich daggers are not an area of knowledge for me other tha

  1. #1

    Default SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    Hello ladies and gents,

    Another one of the endless threads asking for comments about an SS dagger. A good friend who likes to visit swap meets and antique auctions just picked this dagger up locally. Third Reich daggers are not an area of knowledge for me other than some rudimentary basics, so all I could really offer were a few comments including that the grip seems to fit well to the cross guard.

    Sorry, I know picture quality is crucial, but these are the only available ones. Are they sufficiently clear to arrive at any conclusions?

    Many thanks in advance,
    Tony
    Click to enlarge the picture Click to enlarge the picture SS dagger opinion - Early Boker   SS dagger opinion - Early Boker  

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker   SS dagger opinion - Early Boker  

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker   SS dagger opinion - Early Boker  

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker  
    Last edited by Larry C; 07-30-2015 at 10:33 AM.
    All thoughts and opinions expressed are those of my own and should not be mistaken for medical and/or legal advice.

    "Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday." - John Wayne

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement SS dagger opinion - Early Boker
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    P
    Many
     

  3. #2
    ?

    Default

    First thing I see is, that the dagger is placed wrong in the scabbard.
    I also see a painted scabbard which is seen by RZM daggers. This is a Böker, so early period '33-'35.
    Should be an anodized (blued) scabbard. Maybe period repaint.
    Etching is correct for Böker. Imo a nice dagger but not sure this is the Original scabbard that belongs to the dagger.

    But, if your friend has this dagger in his possession, ask him if he would make more and better detailled pictures.
    Always interesting for all of us.

  4. #3

    Default

    Upon first looks, I am not liking it. The strike of the "1" initially throws off the other known fonts of other strikes on original examples.

  5. #4
    ?

    Default

    Quote by octavian View Post
    Upon first looks, I am not liking it. The strike of the "1" initially throws off the other known fonts of other strikes on original examples.
    I don't see any problem with the Roman number 'I'.

  6. #5

    Default

    Quote by KRISSE View Post
    . . . But, if your friend has this dagger in his possession, ask him if he would make more and better detailled pictures.
    Always interesting for all of us.
    First off, thanks for your comments guys. Unfortunately the dagger no longer in his possession. Shipped off as a gift to his brother (nice gift if it's real!). He is not a member here but is following this thread and commented that the scabbard does appear to have been painted as a chip reveaed a grey or dark blue finish underneath.

    Many thanks again,
    Tony
    All thoughts and opinions expressed are those of my own and should not be mistaken for medical and/or legal advice.

    "Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday." - John Wayne

  7. #6

    Default

    HI AJ.. No worries you and many others are welcome here anytime..and post what you wish. I saw those crossguards a mile away ..and immediately thought Boker. The dagger apart from the scabbard....has a rare first type logo. Something the type collector would quickly acquire.
    I cant say much for the scabbard and agree with Krisse observations that there are lighting issues in the photography. Scabbard appears or at least the paint appears as and RZM paint job. The fittings appear early..but all due to the lighting. The Roman Numeral I is correct and is the correct stamping in depth and appearance.

    The guy who received this dagger will be extra thrilled if he knew the rarity of this highly desirable producer. I mved this thread to the SS dagger forum. Your welcome anytime here Tony Regards Larry
    It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!! - Larry C

    One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C

    “The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” - Winston Churchill

  8. #7

    Default

    Hello Larry,

    Thanks for the warm welcome, and sorry for posting in the wrong forum. Apologies also for the poor quality of the hastily taken cellphone pics as I know how they hinder any verification process. I told my friend to 'hold tight until Larry weighs in - then you'll get the definitive verdict'. You are a scholar and a gentleman, and on behalf of my friend many thanks again to you, KRISSE and Octavian.

    Cheers,
    Tony
    All thoughts and opinions expressed are those of my own and should not be mistaken for medical and/or legal advice.

    "Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday." - John Wayne

  9. #8

    Default

    Personally, I'm not seeing any problems of note on this early Boker. Yes, the anodized sheath has been painted over, but it Looks like an early paint job and is quite likely period. The condition is, actually, excellent and looks relatively untouched. And....it's a Boker! "The one everyone wants!". I'd say that your friend's brother just got one Dandy of a gift!
    William

    "Much that once was, is lost. For none now live who remember it."

  10. #9

    Default

    To revisit this thread, in an unlikely twist, my friends brother wasn't as enamored with the gift as one might expect, instead questioning the authenticity. So the dagger has found its way back into my friends hands thereby allowing me to take some better pics as requested. So for the record, here they are in groups of nine, starting off with the homemade case that the dagger was purchased in:

    (click on pics to magnify)

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    Cheers,
    Tony
    Click to enlarge the picture Click to enlarge the picture SS dagger opinion - Early Boker  
    All thoughts and opinions expressed are those of my own and should not be mistaken for medical and/or legal advice.

    "Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday." - John Wayne

  11. #10

    Default

    Lot 2:

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker

    SS dagger opinion - Early Boker
    All thoughts and opinions expressed are those of my own and should not be mistaken for medical and/or legal advice.

    "Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday." - John Wayne

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Important! SS Dagger opinion

    In SS Dienstdolch, 1933 & 1936
    04-28-2014, 07:35 AM
  2. Need Help! need your opinion for this SS dagger

    In SS Dienstdolch, 1933 & 1936
    09-27-2013, 08:41 PM
  3. Opinion on dagger

    In Luftwaffe
    04-16-2012, 08:59 PM
  4. 09-26-2010, 07:38 PM
  5. 01-16-2010, 09:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Virtual Grenadier - Down
Display your banner here