Pls post yours opinions about this skull.
False or orginal.
Thanks
Pls post yours opinions about this skull.
False or orginal.
Thanks
my guess would be fake, but a very good one.
why i think so..
the first thin that struck me was the almost 90 degree angle were the teeth run over in to the bones(right side). with the ones i have and other skulls posted on this forum (search) this angle seems softer.
Also there seems to be a indentation above the left eye socket that runs up to the center upper part of the skull, wich i cant find on other similar skulls. this should be a small slightly dented line (yours looks like a larger triangular shaped dent)
But that may also come from being a relic (damaged/dented)
on the back the prongs seem ok, but in reference to other skulls of this type the bevel of the nose seems way to deep for my liking.
This is just my opinion and i am in no way a expert, like you i am still in the early stage of learning.
i hope our more experienced members will also shine a light on this one, and hope they share their findings on why it is or is not original.
this way us newb's (at least me) will learn a few things
(and i can check my arguments with theirs, and see if i paid attention )
Looks like a Berlin hoard find skull. I have a slight concern over the pins, but other than that, it looks OK to me.
Cheers, Ade.
Similar Threads
Bookmarks