Hi Chris,
Shortly after mobilisation, during October 1914, they were (mostly) issued blue cotton over-trousers, so the red trousers were pretty much out of sight for all but the first month of the war.
Much is made of the high casualties being caused by the visibility of the Garance trousers, though the proximity of the opposing forces - and the concentration of artillery - had far more influence.
That said, they may have been slightly more visible at distance (in some circumstances) than field grey and certainly moreso than the excellent khaki, but for the most part any vast, moving formation was clearly visible.
The same accusation is seldom levelled at the pale, horizon blue, however, though again, artillery and concentrated rifle fire is colourblind.
I quite agree that it is absurd that the bold French Army had to enter a very modern war in a uniform that had barely changed since 1845 - virtually Napoleonic in style!
Only three months prior to the war, the French Army had finally won its longstanding battle to modernise, when the government (disguising penny pinching with patriotism), eventually conceded to the adoption of a blue-grey ‘tricolour’ cloth!
Bright, visible uniforms had made sense in the wars prior to smokeless powder, when the whole battlefield became invisible to its commanders on the hill, after the first volleys.
It is ironic that it was the French who perfected smokeless powder (Poudre Blanche), in 1884.
I’m sure you already know all that, but I’d started and had to see it through!
Cheers,
Bob
Bookmarks